| 
				
					| Lost Buildings of Wolverhampton |  
 
				
					| The Exchange The Exchange stood at the end of Exchange Street (which may have been 
		cut through to provide access to it), immediately in front of the west 
		front of St. Peter's, where the gardens, war memorial and statute of 
					Lady Wulfruna now stand. |  
				
					|  | This 
					drawing may have been made before the Exchange was even 
					built. It shows the 
					glass dome and an entrance which does not appear again. 
					 Maybe it was 
					never built that way, maybe it was changed at the same time 
					the dome was removed. The steps to the right may be the same 
					steps as are still there.  |  
				
					| Nobody has a good word to say for this building. John 
		Roper, in "Wolverhampton as it Was", Vol. 1., calls it a "Victorian 
		white elephant ... erected at a cost of £11,000 by a company of 
		shareholders between 1850 and 1853. It was designed by G. T. Robinson, 
		another Wolverhampton architect and a rival of Edward Banks. Its life 
		was short and the building was demolished in 1898." He returns to the 
		subject in Vol.2 of that work, saying the building was "originally 
		intended simply as a Corn Exchange for the use of farmers and millers" 
		and that "the large glass cupola ... had to be removed in 1851 'having 
		given undeniable signs of depression'. One assumes that the depression 
		was structural, not the result of feeling bad about all the criticism it 
		got. |  
			
          
            | This photo gives a good impression of how this 
			rather bleak-looking building would have dominated it surroundings. The awkward plinth may have been designed to deal with the 
			difference in ground levels between front and back.  The posters show 
			the proprietors' enthusiasm for raising money anyhow. 
			 From an 
			old glass slide, courtesy David Clare. |  |  
				
					| Frank Mason, The Book of Wolverhampton, p.109 has 
		slightly different details but not a better opinion: "The Exchange, 
		built 1851. A good example of bad Victorian architecture, it immediately 
		began to fall down and had to be strengthened and the dome removed. It 
		was described as the only building ever constructed with the foundations 
		at the top. The lighting was bad, and the acoustics worse. In 1863 the 
		Agricultural Hall was built for the greater convenience of the farmers. 
		The Exchange was pulled down in 1898." |  
            
              
                |  | This photo shows the Exchange in its setting. 
				The road is Cheapside, with the retail market on the left and 
				the Exchange beyond it. The pillar in St. Peter's 
				churchyard can be seen in the centre distance. Note how 
				the front of St. Peter's was completely obscured. |   The Exchange. From the Wolverhampton 
				Journal, January 1907.
  The back of the Exchange. From
              the Wolverhampton Journal, March 1904.
  The interior of the Exchange. From the 
			Wolverhampton Journal, January 1907.
 
				
					| But in his work, "Yesterday's Town: Wolverhampton", p99, Mason 
			refers to Dickens' use of the Exchange as for his public readings 
			and his pleasure at the enthusiastic audiences he always found 
			there. He also refers to Dickens commenting, in a letter, about 
			seeing "the iron masters standing out in the streets where they 
			conduct their business, making such a noise they confuse me 
			horribly". Of this Mason says: "he shows how unpopular it was as a 
			place of business. The ironmasters were still using the pavement as 
			they had always done." This suggests, and Upton is with him, that 
			the building was intended, at least in part, for the ironmasters to 
			conduct their business in. Upton and Mason agree that the 
			ironmasters never did; and everyone seems to agree that, if the corn 
			merchants did, they certainly didn't like it. But there are many references and much evidence of the other uses to 
		which the building was put, bad acoustics and lighting or not. Dickens 
		was not the only performer who used the building. Many visiting artists 
		did so and many plays and concerts were put on. Probably the owners were 
		letting it out for whatever use they could find. Anyway, nobody seems to have objected to its demolition and its 
			disappearance certainly opened up the front of St. Peter's to public 
			view. 
 
						
							
								|  |  
								| Return to the previous page
 |  |  |